Dr. Edward Edinger, a Jungian analyst who died recently, once examined five historical people who had been hit by what he termed "the Greater Self," and Edinger then contemplated what these people did in the face of the divine personality. He looked at: Job, Jesus, Buddha, Blake, and Nietchze.
Dr. Carl Jung once said that William Blake went farther into the collective unconscious than anyone and yet lived to tell the tale because he hung onto his ordinariness. Blake painted, wrote, and engraved, without being incinerated by his brush with God. Nietchze expressed the agonized cry of a man who had seen something but didn’t have one person who could understand. If he had possessed only a companion, he might have been able to carry his enlightenment through, but he didn’t, so ultimately it destroyed him.
In my own life I do not want to be an enlightened one or a self-styled savior. More and more I enjoy the most ordinary things, they take on a divine beauty. Occasionally just a color or taste, or slant of sunshine is just breathtaking. It is on the level of attitude -- nothing has to change but the attitude we hold for it. It’s not the things, it is our attitude toward the things.
Please understand I don’t live this way each day, and this is not my personal experience at all times, but it is an attitude that is filtering up and getting close to my reality.
People come to me lamenting the obvious break downs in our cultural and economic system. I don’t know how to talk about this without getting into the flypaper of contradiction. I think I finally understand what my old teacher Krishnamurti was trying to say to me 50 years ago, that all physical materialism and objective knowledge is inappropriate. I feel foolish because there is nowhere to go, that is the summation of what I have learned.
We live in such a difficult time. How are we to be when everything is falling down and breaking apart all around us? For our daily lives we still have to balance the checkbook, make choices and take action. We must do our best to lean toward "the good."
All one can do is carry it through to its conclusion, which is absolute exhaustion or paralysis. Christianity was at least potentially a system for waking one up to four-dimensional consciousness, but it has been translated by the church into three- dimensional terms.
How do we realize this new consciousness collectively?
No three-dimensional action or language has the slightest effect transforming things except perhaps bringing it to a ripeness for transformation. All language is inherently three-dimensional because it is based on the principle of cause and effect. In every sentence there is an equal sign, similar to a math formula. In the first half of sentence, the subject, says "this is something," and the second half, which is about the object, says “that is something” and, if we had the ears to hear it we would realize that it says this is that. But we hear it as cause and effect.
Jung did say, quoting alchemy, which was engrossed in this problem, that one begat two. In other words, consciousness splits and is aware of the other. Two begets three, consciousness turns back on itself -- for humans, this creates self awareness. This is the consciousness we have inherited now. We are three-dimensional people, for the most part, living in a time of inadequate three-dimensional consciousness.
A two-dimensional person sits in a dual world, and is played upon by that world. He or she wathches the gods fight; evil comes, good comes; he/she is sublimely childlike in watching it. That’s the unburdened simple man we are so envious of and try to go back to emulate, hippie-style. I have seen this consciousness first hand in the rural villages of India. For a time I thought of moving there, where life is filled with meaning and people, despite material hardship, are actually more at peace. There is no chance of succeeding at this regression to an earlier form of consciousness, however. Two-dimensional man is helpless -- at times delighted and at other time terrified -- by watching the gods direct his fate.
To satisfy this passion to get out of the contradictions of three-dimensional consciousness, we seek after money, or we try to get the right love partner, or we seek relief on Saturday night at a movie, and the "10,000 things of the world" (as Buddhists describe it) quickly follow. The passion is right, the level is wrong -- the true problem is three-dimensional consciousness itself.
Dr. Jung, one of my heroes, could’t explain it well, but the trinitarian symbols he wrote about in his later works refers to this level of awareness. Dreams that come out of everyone badger people half insane trying to solve in the unconscious the problem of the three. All the dreams where there are three things waiting for the fourth, something is incomplete. In a key dream from my own life, one that I took to Dr. Jung, three Buddhas are born and I am waiting for the fourth Buddha to arrive (This dream and the encounter with Dr. Jung is described in the book Balancing Heaven and Earth). Then, in my dream, a big snake scares the devil out of me. This is code language for the steps of consciousness. In three-dimensional consciousness, something is always thrown out.
All taboos are so holy that they are forbidden.
It is inevitalbe that the fourth thing will show up, the solutiion is not to go on a witch hunt trying to stamp it out. I’m amazed speechless that so many otherwise enlightened people don’t get this. Jung made a few opaque statements on this topic. He wrote that your neurosis is your salvation. Another time he wrote that "your inferior function is your enree to heaven." At Jungian workshops people nod their heads in affirmation, but clearly they don’t get it. People challenged the contradictions in his writings and Dr. Jung replied that he was trying to make it as paradoxical as he could because this is the nature of Reality. His famed book, Answer to Job, is almost universally misunderstood. A sentence at the end, which should have been the opening line, states, "I am not talking about the God in heaven that Christianity keeps making pronouncements about. I’m talking about the god complex in man!"
Theologians and oher scoffers never get that far or are too mesmerized to hear it when they get there.